[CQ-Contest] SA WW Contest

Richard Zalewski w7zr at redrivernet.com
Fri Jun 1 09:03:08 EDT 2001


Anyone out there participating in this contest starting today using TR.  Having
problems with scoring in the program.
Tnx
Dick W7ZR

You Deserve to Be Here!
Check my web site www.w7zr.com


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


>From G3SJJ" <g3sjj at btinternet.com  Fri Jun  1 16:08:12 2001
From: G3SJJ" <g3sjj at btinternet.com (G3SJJ)
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 16:08:12 +0100
Subject: [CQ-Contest] check the ARRL 10m checklog list
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010531202920.020e1060 at mail.pcnet.com>
Message-ID: <004601c0eaad$399ff540$e7007ad5 at default>


Aaah, wow. If I had applied the same criteria to the IOTA Contest 2000
the list of checklogs would have exceeded the valid entries.  Out of 1150
logs received, some 400 were paper plus around 200 electronic files that
were not acceptable ie Excel, Word, EQF, Anyformat, .PRN, .All,  .DMP.
Of the remaining 550, at least 200 would not have been Cabrillo format.
Many summary sheets did not give adequate information and a lot of logs had
to be viewed so that the number of hours could be counted to determine if the
entrant operated 12 or 24 hours. The 100 or so checklogs we listed were self
-designated or non-island multi-op for which there isn't a section.

Chris G3SJJ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Frenaye" <frenaye at pcnet.com>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:34 AM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] check the ARRL 10m checklog list


 >
 >
 > In the ARRL 10m contest list of logs received, N1ND noted:
 >
 > "Logs listed as checklogs either designated themselves as such, did not
 > submit usable log files, or did not provide sufficient information in their
 > Cabrillo summary sheet header to be able to classify their entry."
 >
 > I've listed the callsigns of those planned to be designated as checklogs
 > below, many more than usual.  Please let him know (n1nd at arrl.org) what
 > the category should be if not "checklog".
 >
 > The full checklog list has 116 callsigns... it looks like it hit the DX
 > entries much harder than the W/VE folks.
 >
 >                                   -- Tom


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com




More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list