[CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections

[tombaugh]

Interesting link>>

Seems like we got some beleiving it's the good ole boys club, some believing
the system is flawed and needs to be fixed and some believing we should be
able to set our own adjenda on someone elses idea.

I'm not sure what to think.
It is not our tournament, so we can gripe all we want and not get anywhere.
No matter who gets chosen someone will feel he/she should have been
selected.
Ham radio IS the good ole boys club. Take a look at the general population
and you'll see a tremendous dominance of middle aged to old white men. It is
what it is.Reality.
I'm one of those too.

Count me in.

Tom
AE9B

----- Original Message -----
From: Pete Smith <n4zr at contesting.com>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] USA WRTC 2002 Team Selections


 >
 > Hi Jeff -- don't know if you kept the data, but it might be very
 > instructive to compile a table showing which US ops placed where in each
of
 > the 3 runnings to date.  Perhaps a single figure of merit could be
 > developed, something like (sum of places)/(number of WRTC's attended),
 > which would give us a ranking based on actual results.
 >
 > I'm halfway in your corner, and halfway agree with the "merit first" boys.
 > Seems to me that simply because someone can afford the plane fare and the
 > time to go, and throws his hat into the ring, that shouldn't mean much.
 > But somebody who placed in the top 10 last time and wants to go again
 > probably deserves to be selected.
 >
 > 73, Pete N4ZR
 > Contesting is!
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > --
 > CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
 > Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com