[CQ-Contest] Dayton Topics past WRTC

[Bob Wruble]

the contest gods spent about 3.5 mins discussing the 3 pt penality
issue at visalia and resoundly voted to leave it in place!
good luck at dayton!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Priest" <w3cf at home.com>
To: "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 6:48 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Dayton Topics past WRTC


 >
 > Hello All.........
 >
 > While we are getting together for a WRTC meeting and you are thinking
about
 > that I'd like to give you one more topic to think about. As the new
 > President of FRC I have been hearing strong rumblings that my membership
 > thinks the 3  QSO penalty is excessive. What do the rest of you think? I
 > have an addendum to that question. If the answer is you are satisfied with
 > the 3 Q penalty do the old records get an asterisk?  (i.e.:  * pre-UBN.)
Or
 > do we go back (if at all possible)  and subject the old records to the
same
 > UBN scrutiny that we now suffer under? N3OC figured out we at V26B would
 > have to average 70 Q's more an hour for 48 hours to approach the NA record
 > in CQ Phone to pass today's average UBN figures. And what, pray tell,
would
 > happen if I just so happen to have QSL cards for QSO's that were not
 > allowed? Some things to think about on route to Amateur Radio Mecca. See
you
 > in the Miami Room Thursday night.
 >
 > 73
 >
 > Doug W3CF
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > Doug Priest     W3CF
 > 1360 Providence Lane
 > Hatfield, Pa. 19440
 > w3cf at home.com
 >
 >
 > --
 > CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
 > Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
 >
 >


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com