[CQ-Contest] ARRL CW - No Packet

[Douglas Priest]

How about hand logging the test...no packet...say a nostalgia weekend?? The
old guys who used to do this wud kick our posteriors :-)

73

Doug W3CF

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cq-contest at contesting.com
[mailto:owner-cq-contest at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Marijan Miletic,
S56A
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 7:24 AM
To: Rick Tavan; cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL CW - No Packet




How about skiping SCP as well?

LPMMI S56A

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Rick Tavan
  To: cq-contest at contesting.com
  Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 3:00 AM
  Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL CW - No Packet



  What?! Reintroduce the skill requirement of searching a band for mults?
Give the advantage back to stations that have two positions per band?
Heresy! Sacrilege! Moiduh da bumms!

  (Cool idea, Bill.)

  /Rick N6XI

  Bill Fisher W4AN wrote:

  > I've already got my sites set on ARRL CW.  A few of us bound for OH in
  > July are considering competing in the M/S category and not using
  > packet.  K1DG ran the idea by me this week and the thought of doing a
  > multi-op without packet got me all excited about the contest!
  >
  > So, I'm wondering if it would not be fun for all of the top multi-op
  > stations to turn off the cluster for just one weekend?  After its over,
  > lets see if you don't all have more fun.  I know I will.
  >
  > 73
  >
  > Bill Fisher, W4AN


  --
  CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
  Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com