[CQ-Contest] SS Question
aa4lr at arrl.net
Thu Nov 15 08:55:53 EST 2001
On 11/14/01 7:37 PM, Jim Reisert at jjreisert at alum.mit.edu wrote:
>>So long as your log reflects what you actually sent, everything is fine.
>I don't buy this argument. The rules are the rules. They say to do it a
>certain way. The log checkers ONLY have the rules to apply to the
>logs. If they apply a different standard, so be it. But if that standard
>is not documented IN THE RULES, then it may not work tomorrow, so you can't
>rely on it.
Well, I based this information on how the contest judges have ajudicated
logs in the past. You're right. It could change.
However, the way they have done it seems ultimately fair. I see no reason
for them to change it.
This topic was discussed at length following the 1998 SS. Tree, N6TR
detailed how the logs are analysed:
Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
-- Wilbur Wright, 1901
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest