[CQ-Contest] Why I Won't Be in CQWW CW This Year

[James Neiger]

This pre-supposes, of course, that CQ WW is "perfect", and couldn't be made
better by some fine-tuning?

Jim
N6TJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Daniel" <nn4t at bellsouth.net>
To: "John Laney" <k4bai at worldnet.att.net>; <K3BU at aol.com>
Cc: <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Why I Won't Be in CQWW CW This Year


>
> The CQWW tests have more entrants than any other DX contests and are
widely
> recognized as "the" premier DX contesting events for CW and SSB. Why argue
> with success? Spend the time you're putting into this discussion into
> tweaking your stations for the upcoming test and get ready to have fun.
> Steve, NN4T.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Laney" <k4bai at worldnet.att.net>
> To: <K3BU at aol.com>
> Cc: <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Why I Won't Be in CQWW CW This Year
>
>
> >
> > The second weekend after CQ WW SSB will usually be the second full
> > weekend in November and the weekend between ARRL SS CW and SSB.  That
> > has been traditionally the OK/OM DX Contest weekend, which attracts a
> > good bit of activity worldwide.  Certainly such a change should not be
> > made without consulting with our OK/OM friends.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > John, K4BAI/8P9HT.
> >
> >
> > --
> > CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> > Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com