[CQ-Contest] 160M band plan & CQWW

[Bill Coleman]

On 10/17/01 3:52 PM, Tom Osborne at w7why at harborside.com wrote:

>I think he was talking about CQ'ers who call and call and never
>get any answers.  I hear that all the time.  If you have the
>muscle to be heard, CQ'ing isn't all that bad.  But if you're 
>PW, you are just wasting time and causing QRM.

An alternative is to CQ above 1843 kHz, which is in conformance with the 
bandplan, and listen below, where DX stations are more likely.

It just occurred to me -- have we traded a situation where 1830-1835 kHz 
was the "window" to one where 1800-1843 kHz is now the "window"?

Hmm...

Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
            -- Wilbur Wright, 1901


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com