[CQ-Contest] eQSL change of policy

[Ronald Rossi]

Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote:
> 
> K1IR's post disappoints me.
> 
> Why is any change blamed on ARRL HQ, why is it always bad, and why is always
> the ARRL which is at fault?

They were slow to pick up the ball on this issue, but still want to define a
standard and determine the rules. The folks that started eQSL are forward
looking and getting the job done. Double blind is not how it is done for paper,
why should it be done that way electronically? In answer to "how would you make
this work?"...we have a working model.

-- 
73 es God Bless de KK1L...ron (kk1l at arrl.net) <><
QTH: Jericho, Vermont
My page: http://www.qsl.net/kk1l