Fw: [CQ-Contest] eQSL change of policy

Rex Maner k7qq at netzero.net
Sun Apr 7 07:49:15 EDT 2002


Quacks
The following by VE5XZ is an exlent idea for LOtw and would encourage more
contest activity I'm sure by the casual op's who are looking to get WAS ,
DXCC, and band states , countries.  I hope others in the Contest community
will push this idea.
Rex   K7QQ

> > Anyone got a different solution?
>
> Accept the simple realization that an ARRL award or any other award for
that
> matter is simply that an award. We do not need to build a Fort Knox to
> protect these awards. And yes cheaters will some times get certificates -
so
> what! Why not build a system that follows an age old amateur radio
community
> tradition of striving to enable the exchange of knowledge and not hinder
it.
>
> A twist. All entries logs submitted to an ARRL contest and verified by the
> contest checking software should automatically be accredited to any ARRL
> award for which it is considered to be a valid contact. No eQSL or QSL
> required! Could be one way of getting more participation in contests as
well
> as more check logs!
>
> .. sylvan
>
> Ô¿Ô¬
> ----------------
> Sylvan Katz, VE5ZX
> Saskatoon, SK
> "A Novel Perspective of Amateur Radio Contesting" at
> http://www.dynamicforesight.com/~ve5zx
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>




More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list