[CQ-Contest] NS3T's "witch-hunt"

Zack Widup w9sz at prairienet.org
Fri Apr 19 11:23:05 EDT 2002

On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Chuck wrote:

> Ahh, well. Someone failed to READ all of NS3T's
> comments concerning his intent and purpose for
> the postings, it seems.
> I did not read NS3T's comments as flames,
> attempts to engage in a witch hunt or anything
> like that.
> I saw it as an attempt to provide data and some
> kind of REASONABLE thought and analysis as to the
> WHAT behind the WHY.
> ALthough I'm not an analyst, I found it useful
> for thought and consideration as I'm sure others
> did as well.
> Thanks, NS3T, for the info.
> 73
> Chuck K3FT

I had a misunderstanding.  Jamie pointed out to me that "inactive" didn't
mean that the station wasn't in the contest, but rather that the callsign
hadn't been issued according to recent databases.  That makes the whole
thing much more intriguing. I'm now among the curious!

Zack W9SZ

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list