[CQ-Contest] Consider This

[Barry]

Dennis,
I added a second radio a few years ago to improve my 
competiveness (and fun!) as a single-op, or SOA. Now that some 
single ops have found a way to improve their scores within the rules 
you want to change those rules. Is that fair? I've already spent my 
time, effort and money on the second radio setup. BTW, I do it all 
with a one tower station, so don't tell me you need major real 
estate, mltiple towers, megabucks, etc. That argument doesn't fly.

Using your logic, multi-single should be split into more than one 
category. There's MO1R - a bunch of guys time-sharing one radio. 
MO2R - a bunch of guys sharing 2 radios, where one is a run radio 
and the other is a mult radio. MOMR - a bunch of guys sharing 
what should be a multi-multi, where one guy runs, and 3 or 4 other 
guys tune the bands chasing mults watching 10 minute timers, 
etc. 

And how about breaking down multi-multi? There are the 
"professional" stations like LPL, XX, JA where guys fly in from all 
over the world to operate. On the other hand, there are stations like 
K3ANS and W3PP that are less "refined" and encourage newbies 
to operate to gain experience.

Better yet, let's let everyone have their own category and decide 
who they want to compete with.

73,
Barry W2UP
On 22 Apr 02, at 21:55, Dennis Vernacchia wrote:

> Dick,
> 
>          I sent mail to this reflector over a yearago mirroring your
> suggestions that SO2R be a separate category but the guys that already
> run SO2R don't want to hear it now that they have the advantage.
> 
>         I also suggested that each contest summary that posted on the
> reflectors etc, have a column indicating whether SO2R was utilized.
> That's all, do it for a couple years then look at all teh results and
> you will seee that the top guys are USUALLY on top. Yes, sometimes an
> SO2R station gets beat but that is due to other factors like a poor Op
> or lack of good equipment/antennas.
> 
> Bottom line, just list it in results.
> 
> 73, Dennis  N6KI
> 
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:37:47 -0700 "Richard Zalewski"
> <w7zr at citlink.net> writes: > How about considering this regarding SO2R
> as a separate class. > > Most recent WPX SSB > > SO AB (A) HP > > NV4X
>    2880 Q  960 PFX  33 HRS  7.58M > WZ7ZR 1836 Q  749 PFX  32 HRS 
> 2.78M > > Not to take a thing away from K4MA as the operator at NV4X
> or the > fact that > he is East Coast but come on....you can't keep
> telling me that SO2R > is not a > separate classification. > > I sure
> would like to see more analysis of this type where SO2R in a > current
> > class is compared to SO1R in the same class.  I would do it but >
> unfortunetly > I only saved the SO (A) AB HP posts. > > Dick W7ZR > >
> Price Reduced!! > Vacation or Retire Here > It's Paradise on the Beach
> > www.w7zr.com > > _______________________________________________ >
> CQ-Contest mailing list > CQ-Contest at contesting.com >
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest > 
> 
> 
> 73,
> 
> Dennis Vernacchia N6KI
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
> Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
> Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


--
Barry Kutner, W2UP              Internet: w2up at mindspring.com
Newtown, PA                     Frankford Radio Club