[CQ-Contest] Re: CQWW Phone results in CQ magazine

[M.Sivcevic, VK4DX]

Well, if you happen to be the World #1 in your category and then you 
find out to be classified into the wrong category where you are 137th or 
so, you wouldn't call it accuracy, would you.

What CQ WW Contest organizers MUST MUST MUST do is to publish claimed 
scores on the web, just like Steve N8BJQ does for WPX contest. That 
would help to avoid a lot of disappointment for some.

73 Mike, VK4DX
==============================================
Visit VK4DX Contest calendar at www.vk4dx.net



 >jukka.klemola at nokia.com jukka.klemola at nokia.com
 >Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:52:59 +0300

 >So, CQWW committee made a -B.
 >Committee's scoring accuracy is still above 99.9% !

 >With more than 10.000 scores announced that is world's
 >most accurate operation still !

 >73,
 >Jukka

 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: ext Goran SM4DHF [mailto:sm4dhf at telia.com]
 > Sent: 31 July, 2002 21:57
 > To: cq-contest at contesting.com
 > Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Phone results in CQ magazine
 >
 >
 > Hi,
 > just heard from a friend in W7 who got the CQ Magazine that
 > my contest operation
 > in CQWW Phone 2001 as TI2/SM4DHF seems to be listed as a
 > winning score for Europe on
 > 15 m LP!!
 >
 > I have no idea how this happend... the soapbox comment that
 > is on the CQ Internet page
 > is not what was in my cabrillo file either!
 >
 > Trying to sort this out with CQ at the moment.
 >
 > 73 Goran SM4DHF
 > **************************************
 > http://www.sm4dhf.com/search.shtml
 > log search collection
 >
 >
 >
 > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
 > multipart/alternative
 >   text/plain (text body -- kept)
 >   text/html
 > ---
 > _______________________________________________
 > CQ-Contest mailing list
 > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
 > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
 >