[CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ

[Matt & Carrie Trott]

Great idea. I'll take a lifetime sub to NCJ.

Matt--K7BG

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cq-contest at contesting.com
[mailto:owner-cq-contest at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Lee Hiers
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:54 AM
To: k1zz at arrl.org; k1ro at arrl.org
Cc: w4rh at arrl.org; Sandy Donahue; w5jbp at arrl.org;
cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ



You guys may not have seen this mentioned on the contest reflector, 
or may not have given it serious consideration, but I think you 
should.

Should contest coverage be effectively removed from QST, as I feel it 
will be, why not offer the members the choice of which periodical 
they receive?

I know other membership organizations do this (such as the NRA).  

At this point, I think I would choose NCJ over QST, as there is 
generally little in QST of interest to me other than contest 
coverage.  

Would this not represent additional cost savings to the League?

73 de Lee


--
Lee Hiers, AA4GA
Cornelia, GA

lee at dixieliner.com


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.313 / Virus Database: 174 - Release Date: 01/02/2002

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.313 / Virus Database: 174 - Release Date: 01/02/2002


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com