[CQ-Contest] ARRL report on line scores decision

Zack Widup w9sz at prairienet.org
Tue Jul 23 12:06:41 EDT 2002

All the "good stuff" (for the technically-minded) is in QEX these days.
The last issue I got, which had articles on software-defined radio, was

And then there's NCJ.

QST doesn't appeal to me much anymore, either.

73, Zack W9SZ

On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Barry  wrote:

> I find it surprising, and disappointing, that two of the directors, K1KI 
> and N2FF, both of whom are contesters, voted to remove contest 
> results from QST. While they are under no obligation to explain 
> themselves, perhaps they would care to, anyway...
> Personally, I find QST of little interest of value. As the League is 
> interested in cost cutting, perhaps they should consider a dual-
> priced membership:
> One for those who want QST, and another price for those that don't.
> Comments?
> 73,
> Barry W2UP

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list