[CQ-Contest] Re: CQ WPX Check Logs

[Gerry Maira]

I would try putting "checklog" in the subject line and in the soapbox field. I sent in 
cabrillo files to the ARRL for the 2001 CW and SSB DX contests. I wanted them used only
as checklogs and stated that very clearly in the soapbox fields. They ended up in the
contest results as regular entries. I suppose I could have said "I cheated in this
contest" in the soapbox fields and no one would have noticed - hi. I thought the emails
with my logs might bounce if I put "checklog" in the subject, but now I see that's
probably the proper way to get the message through. 

73, Gerry KA2MGE



> Message: 6
> Reply-To: <no5w at txucom.net>
> From: "Charles Sanders" <no5w at txucom.net>
> To: "'Ron Notarius WN3VAW'" <wn3vaw at fyi.net>,
>    "'CQ Contest'" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX Check Logs
> Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 19:39:01 -0500
> 
> Ron --
> 
> In the Cabrillo summary sheet spec www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/ CheckLog is
> indicated as one of the categories although the official rules do not
> mention anything about that as a category.
> 
> Never tried that myself although I have had the opportunity with many meager
> scores!
> 
> 73/Chuck/NO5W
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-admin at contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-admin at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Ron Notarius WN3VAW
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 5:52 PM
> To: CQ Contest
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX Check Logs
> 
> Does anyone know if there is any way to have my meager logged flagged as a
> "check log" when submitted for the CW WPX?
> 
> Due to lack of time that weekend, I made an appalling low number of contacts
> (no, I'm not telling you how many, it's embarrassing!) and while I have no
> problem helping out the log checkers, I don't want to make an "official"
> entry.
> 
> 73, ron wn3vaw
> 
> "And they give you cash,
> which is just as good as money!"
> Yogi Berra, AFLAC Commercial, 2002