[CQ-Contest] TS-850SAT and Optional Filters - Opinions Wanted

[Dan Violette]

I like the KW 500 filter first and an INRAD 400 next.

73. Dan KI6X

-----Original Message-----
   >From: "K7LXC at aol.com" <K7LXC at aol.com>
   >Sent: 3/21/02 11:05:16 PM
   >To: "TJCoker at lasd.org" <TJCoker at lasd.org>, "cq-contest at contesting.com"
<cq-contest at contesting.com>
   >Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] TS-850SAT and Optional Filters - Opinions
Wanted
     >In a message dated 3/21/02 1:18:20 PM Pacific Standard Time,
TJCoker at lasd.org
   >writes:
   >
   >> I currently have one Kenwood YK-88C-1 (8830khz - 500hz CW)
   >>  filter currently installed in the radio. Would you agree that I
should sell
   >>  this filter and replace it with one from Inrad?
   >
   >    Yes, yes and YES. The INRAD filters are the best.
   >
   >>  I have read many people
   >>  consider the Inrad filters to be better than the Kenwood filters but
have
   >no
   >>  basis to judge this on personally.
   >
   >    They are fabulous. Nice sharp skirts that really play on cw and the
phone
   >ones REALLY make the slope tuning on my 940 work exquisitely on SSB.
   >
   >Cheers,
   >Steve      K7LXC
   >Tower Tech -
   >Professional tower work for amateurs
   >_______________________________________________
   >CQ-Contest mailing list
   >CQ-Contest at contesting.com
   >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contestO