[CQ-Contest] TS-850SAT and Optional Filters - Opinions Wanted
Dan Violette
danki6x at earthlink.net
Fri Mar 22 21:29:52 EST 2002
I like the KW 500 filter first and an INRAD 400 next.
73. Dan KI6X
-----Original Message-----
>From: "K7LXC at aol.com" <K7LXC at aol.com>
>Sent: 3/21/02 11:05:16 PM
>To: "TJCoker at lasd.org" <TJCoker at lasd.org>, "cq-contest at contesting.com"
<cq-contest at contesting.com>
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] TS-850SAT and Optional Filters - Opinions
Wanted
>In a message dated 3/21/02 1:18:20 PM Pacific Standard Time,
TJCoker at lasd.org
>writes:
>
>> I currently have one Kenwood YK-88C-1 (8830khz - 500hz CW)
>> filter currently installed in the radio. Would you agree that I
should sell
>> this filter and replace it with one from Inrad?
>
> Yes, yes and YES. The INRAD filters are the best.
>
>> I have read many people
>> consider the Inrad filters to be better than the Kenwood filters but
have
>no
>> basis to judge this on personally.
>
> They are fabulous. Nice sharp skirts that really play on cw and the
phone
>ones REALLY make the slope tuning on my 940 work exquisitely on SSB.
>
>Cheers,
>Steve K7LXC
>Tower Tech -
>Professional tower work for amateurs
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contestO
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list