[CQ-Contest] Thanks to the ARRL Robot

[Salina Physician Anesthesia]

Finally got around to submitting my meager log for the ARRL SSB DX: 

Looks like I had a couple of "senior moments" (memory lapses for the 
non-native English readers) plus it seems to have accepted the KW, K, 1K, 
etc powers I left in, but did find the serious mistakes and was kind (if 
robots can be such) enough to give me a chance to correct. 

Well done ARRL 

N0UU 

From:
                         ARRL Contest Robot <robot at arrl.org>
                     To:
                         Lawrence Stoskopf <stoskopf at tri.net>
               Reply-To:
                         robot at arrl.org
                   Date:
                         25 Mar 2002, 07:49:42 AM
                 Subject:
                         [4057.dxphone] Re: N0UU ARRL DX SSB SO HP 2002 

 

               (This is an automated response). 

               Thank you for your participation in the contest and for 
submitting
               your log in Cabrillo format.  While the robot appears to be 
able to
               process your log, it appears to have discovered 
irregularities in your
               log. These do not affect its ability to be processed but 
correcting
               these problems will help ensure the entry is properly scored. 
These
               irregularities appear in a report at the bottom of this 
message. You
               are encouraged to review and fix these irregularities. You 
may then
               re-send it to dxphone at arrl.org. You may have to resubmit your 
log
               two or three times to get everything just right.
               http://www.arrl.org/contests/rate-sheet/. 

(snip) 

               ---------- 

               ARRL DX CONTEST LOG WARNING MESSAGE REPORT FROM THE ROBOT 

               QSO: 28000 PH 2002-03-02 1653 N0UU           59 KS     OM5AW  
KW
                 Line 265 was discarded.  'KW' is not a valid RS(T). 

               QSO: 28000 PH 2002-03-02 1831 N0UU           59 KS     EA1FD  
5 100
                 Line 292 was discarded.  '5' is not a valid RS(T).