[CQ-Contest] SWL category WAS Beyond Unsportsmanlike
Bryan - k0emt
k0emt at dbbear.com
Wed Nov 6 19:06:26 EST 2002
There are probably a number of ppl that are just deleting this thread by
now.
So, I changed the topic and left in the majority of Ford's comments.
This sounds like an awesome idea to me. This could be a nice category
on ANY CW test.
73,
Bryan -- k0emt
http://www.dbbear.com/k0emt/
On 2002-11-05, 14:45:19, "Ford Peterson" <ford at cmgate.com> wrote:
> A number of respondents (I count about 60 to date in my inbox), seem to
> think the slowbies are not even welcome in SS. OK. Then let's start a
new
> class ... S ... SWL
> SWL:
> Copy as many callsigns and valid exchanges during the same 24 hour
period.
> Submit your log like any other contester. QSO pts awarded for every
valid Q
> confirmed by log checking.
> 1) it would provide the basis for "competition" without "blocking the
road."
> 2) it would be an excellent way to "learn" SS
> 3) code speed would be dramatically increased
> 4) The slowbies won't be getting in the way.
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list