[CQ-Contest] SS CW thoughts
Jim Reisert AD1C
jjreisert at alum.mit.edu
Wed Oct 30 22:56:21 EST 2002
At 05:53 PM 10/30/2002 -0500, Georgek5kg at aol.com wrote:
>If I go assisted (still undecided), I will continue to put out spots
>without sections for two reasons: 1.) I don't want the bother of having
>to enter section info into the spot, and 2.) I don't believe that the
>section info should be included in the spot info; the section should be
>learned during the exchange.
Good for you, George. You are entitled to do whatever you want. Packet
during SS is a bottomless pit of lazy operators, and it starts merely hours
into the contest. I've witnessed the harassment (*) given to people who
put out spots without the sections in them. I don't understand why it's so
darned important. IMHO, getting a clean sweep has been totally minimized
by the use of packet. Thank heavens that the ARRL finally outlawed using
DX packet clusters to work QSOs in Field Day a few years back.
73 - Jim AD1C
(*) I'm not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV either!
--
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com
PGP Fingerprint: D8E2 3D78 339F A7F1 8C13 1193 B5D1 4FB6 79D1 70DC
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list