[CQ-Contest] Rec-All or Rec-All Pro

[esa.p.korhonen at nokia.com]

What I have noticed the settings mainly affect more or less the file size only. The audio quality depends on how the connections are made. I take the audio from the headphones output using a Y-connector to split the audio to the headphones and the PC. I'm superimposing the channels into one line for the PC through two 0.01u caps.

Can't recall the actual settings (my ham-computer is boxed up for a move) but with my settings 1 hour generates an 8Mb file and the quality is more than decent.

73, Esa oh7wv

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Pete Smith [mailto:n4zr at contesting.com]
Sent: 13 February, 2003 14:54
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Rec-All or Rec-All Pro


I'm trying to set up Rec-All to record the upcoming ARRL CW contest, and am 
having trouble getting good audio in the recording.  I have tried both the 
headphone jack and the External Audio jack on the Mark 5, and am 
dissatisfied with results with both.  Anyone out there using this software 
who can give me advice on which CODEC to use, scan rate, and other settings?

73, Pete N4ZR
The World HF Contest Station Database was updated 1 Feb 03.
Are you current? www.pvrc.org/wcsd/wcsdsearch.htm



---------------------------------------------------------------
    The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
       http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest