[CQ-Contest] David Clark phones
WD4K
Ttow1 at Charter.net
Sun Jul 20 12:34:47 EDT 2003
I have the David Clark H10-13.4 phones in addition to several Heil sets. I
gave up on the electret mic after a lot of tinkering and just ran a new
small audio cable to the existing mic housing and hardwired a Heil cartridge
onto the stock Clark mic support. The extra cable is tied to the existing
one so not much difference and the radio EQ matches if I want to switch from
the Clark to the Heils. Tommy WD4K
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of
cq-contest-request at contesting.com
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 11:04 AM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 7, Issue 29
Send CQ-Contest mailing list submissions to
cq-contest at contesting.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cq-contest-request at contesting.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
cq-contest-owner at contesting.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CQ-Contest digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. RE: David Clark H10-40 Headset (Mike Allisette)
2. Re: David Clark H10-40 Headset (Michael Tope)
3. Re: Was "R2" a valid Mult in IARU? (John Warren)
4. Re: Was "R2" a valid Mult in IARU? (Pete Smith)
5. Re: Was "R2" a valid Mult in IARU? (Ron Wetjen)
6. Re: massaging the logs (Kelly Taylor)
7. Re: Was "R2" a valid Mult in IARU? (Ragnar Otterstad)
8. RE: Re: Was "R2" a valid Mult in IARU? (Dale L Martin)
9. Cabrillo Format for RTTY NAQP (Bob Patten)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 07:21:08 +0100
From: "Mike Allisette" <mike.allisette at virgin.net>
To: "Michael Tope" <W4EF at dellroy.com>, <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] David Clark H10-40 Headset
Message-ID: <NHBBKFBCELJBFPOKPLMFEELOCEAA.mike.allisette at virgin.net>
In-Reply-To: <003401c34d25$1f00a310$0100a8c0 at 1800XP>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Message: 1
Mike,
I picked up one of these headsets on eBay earlier this year for a song (it
was listed in the wrong section!). Have yet to try the mic though (operate
mostly CW). I was after good external attenuation and they really excel in
this area.
My rig(s) are Icoms (IC765 7 IC 730)which need present 600 ohm mic i/p.
As soon as I find a suitable socket for the mic plug (any ideas where I can
get one?) I'll give it a try. I don't want to cut the plug off just yet as
that would ruin any resale value on the head set.
73
Mike GU4EON
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Michael Tope
Sent: 18 July 2003 13:07
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] David Clark H10-40 Headset
Has anyone had any luck getting decent audio from
the stock electret microphone element in the David
Clark H10-40 Headset? I got decent audio from mine
using my Ten-Tec Paragon, but when I tried it
with a TS-950 it sounded awful (very distorted).
In both cases I was using 12V DC bias with a 1.8K
series resistor, and a 47uF blocking capacitor to
power the electret mic. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Mike, W4EF
---------------------------------------------------------------
The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 00:37:07 -0700
From: "Michael Tope" <W4EF at dellroy.com>
To: "Mike Allisette" <mike.allisette at virgin.net>,
<cq-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] David Clark H10-40 Headset
Message-ID: <01a701c34dc8$920317a0$0100a8c0 at 1800XP>
References: <NHBBKFBCELJBFPOKPLMFEELOCEAA.mike.allisette at virgin.net>
Precedence: list
Message: 2
Mike,
You can get the mic jacks from the RF connection:
http://www.therfc.com/micconn.htm
The 3/16PJ Drake/Collins Mic Jack is the one you
want.
I mounted the jack in a small plastic case along with
a 1/4 mono jack for the headphones. I use a pair of
paralleled audio transformers in the plastic box to
combine a stereo input source into a composite
mono signal so I can use the unmodified headset
with a single op 2 radio setup. The plastic case also
houses the bias circuit for the electret microphone.
Now if I could just get it biased right to work with
the TS-950S, I would be all set.
73 de Mike, W4EF..............
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Allisette" <mike.allisette at virgin.net>
To: "Michael Tope" <W4EF at dellroy.com>; <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:21 PM
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] David Clark H10-40 Headset
> Mike,
>
> I picked up one of these headsets on eBay earlier this year for a song (it
> was listed in the wrong section!). Have yet to try the mic though (operate
> mostly CW). I was after good external attenuation and they really excel in
> this area.
>
> My rig(s) are Icoms (IC765 7 IC 730)which need present 600 ohm mic i/p.
>
> As soon as I find a suitable socket for the mic plug (any ideas where I
can
> get one?) I'll give it a try. I don't want to cut the plug off just yet as
> that would ruin any resale value on the head set.
>
> 73
>
> Mike GU4EON
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Michael Tope
> Sent: 18 July 2003 13:07
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] David Clark H10-40 Headset
>
>
> Has anyone had any luck getting decent audio from
> the stock electret microphone element in the David
> Clark H10-40 Headset? I got decent audio from mine
> using my Ten-Tec Paragon, but when I tried it
> with a TS-950 it sounded awful (very distorted).
> In both cases I was using 12V DC bias with a 1.8K
> series resistor, and a 47uF blocking capacitor to
> power the electret mic. Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike, W4EF
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
> THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
> http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 07:15:31 -0600
From: John Warren <nt5c at texas.net>
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Re: Was "R2" a valid Mult in IARU?
Message-ID: <p04330107bb3ef351a9aa at EIM-Mac-1.0.7>
In-Reply-To: <3F1810E6.18576.FD8499 at localhost>
References: <3F1810E6.18576.FD8499 at localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: list
Message: 3
Roy AD5Q wrote:
>That is what VE6HF was sending each time I worked him. He is
>also in Zone 02. Is "R2" a special mult, or was this just his way of
>saying he is in IARU Zone 02?
I worked G3BJ, who was giving "R1". I assumed that they were some
sort of IARU representative stations for their respective ITU Regions?
John, NT5C.
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:22:28 -0400
From: Pete Smith <n4zr at contesting.com>
To: ids at nol.net
Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Was "R2" a valid Mult in IARU?
Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.2.20030719081755.01b884d0 at mail.adelphia.net>
In-Reply-To: <3F1810E6.18576.FD8499 at localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: list
Message: 4
At 03:23 PM 7/18/03 -0500, you wrote:
>That is what VE6HF was sending each time I worked him. He is
>also in Zone 02. Is "R2" a special mult, or was this just his way of
>saying he is in IARU Zone 02?
>
>Roy -- AD5Q
From the rules: "Members of the IARU Administrative Council and the three
IARU regional Executive committees send "AC," "R1,""R2," and "R3" as
appropriate.... 8. Multipliers: The total number of ITU zones plus IARU
member society HQ stations worked on each band (not mode.) IARU officials
represent a maximum of four multipliers per band (AC, R1, R2 and R3)."
73, Pete N4ZR
The World HF Contest Station Database was updated 17 June 03.
Are you current? www.pvrc.org/wcsd/wcsdsearch.htm
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:42:55 -0400
From: Ron Wetjen <wd4ahz at gte.net>
To: ids at nol.net
Cc: CQ-Contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Was "R2" a valid Mult in IARU?
Message-ID: <3F193CCF.9010900 at gte.net>
In-Reply-To: <3F1810E6.18576.FD8499 at localhost>
References: <3F1810E6.18576.FD8499 at localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Message: 5
R.S.Hradilek wrote:
> That is what VE6HF was sending each time I worked him. He is
> also in Zone 02. Is "R2" a special mult, or was this just his way of
> saying he is in IARU Zone 02?
From the IARU Rules:
8. Multipliers: The total number of ITU zones plus IARU member society
HQ stations worked on each band (not mode.) IARU officials represent a
maximum of four multipliers per band (AC, R1, R2 and R3).
Ron, WD4AHZ
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 15:22:19 -0500
From: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt at mb.sympatico.ca>
To: <discreetly_confidential at yahoo.com>,
"CQ Contest" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] massaging the logs
Message-ID: <003601c34e33$74d1a1e0$0100a8c0 at joe>
References: <20030718132853.94235.qmail at web41303.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Message: 6
Just because a rule may be unenforceable doesn't mean it has no value. Many
rules are completely unenforceable yet are valued by honorable operators as
guidelines to operating in an ethical manner. (I mean, how many stations of
a certain Mediterranean country really are running only 400 watts? Does that
mean that rules demanding compliance with national regulations are void?)
Post-contest corrections based on real-time notes (you realized as you hit
enter that the call was KR2Q, not KR23Q but your rate was such you couldn't
edit it then so you left yourself a note) are not wrong. The note you left
yourself is a part of the log. (Catching KR23Q while reading the log later
is also only finding a valid typo. I wouldn't consider changing it then to
be wrong, either. This ain't typing class, folks.)
If the sponsors don't wish honorable operators to record their contests and
use the recordings for post-contest cheating, they should say so, regardless
of whether the rule is enforceable.
73, kelly
ve4xt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck" <discreetly_confidential at yahoo.com>
To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:28 AM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] massaging the logs
> Honestly, I have to wonder WHY all the concern
> with someone who records the entire contest that
> transpired at THEIR station going back and doing
> some 'after contest' review.
>
> Time limits are not going to stop someone who
> wants to do it. If they want to do it.. they'll
> make the time necessary to meet any deadline.
>
> If you impose an artificial deadline to deal with
> a 'problem' such as this, you risk damaging those
> folks who are not affected.
>
> There is not ONE person who has not gone back
> 'post-contest' and made
> corrections/changes/additions' to their logs
> based on notes, recalled items, or observed items
> from other sources that drove them to do 'post
> contest' work.
>
> One benefit of folks doing this is that if they
> BUSTED YOUR call and their post contest work
> FIXED it.. then you might just be saved from a 3
> QSO penalty along with them. If it happened to be
> a mult.... well.....
>
> Strikes me as a tempest in a teapot.
>
> 73
>
> Chuck K3FT
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
> THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
> http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 10:36:07 +0200
From: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad at enter.vg>
To: "John Warren" <nt5c at texas.net>, <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Re: Was "R2" a valid Mult in IARU?
Message-ID: <MBBBJCHIMOLLDEAHAJGKOEOIFCAA.otterstad at enter.vg>
In-Reply-To: <p04330107bb3ef351a9aa at EIM-Mac-1.0.7>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Message: 7
>
> >That is what VE6HF was sending each time I worked him. He is
> >also in Zone 02. Is "R2" a special mult, or was this just his way of
> >saying he is in IARU Zone 02?
>
> I worked G3BJ, who was giving "R1". I assumed that they were some
> sort of IARU representative stations for their respective ITU Regions?
G3BJ is indeed a member of the IARU Region 1 exceutive
committee.
73
Rag LA5HE
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 05:26:21 -0500
From: "Dale L Martin" <kg5u at hal-pc.org>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: Was "R2" a valid Mult in IARU?
Message-ID: <LPBBJJHKFOOEGKEBKHOJIEJAFAAA.kg5u at hal-pc.org>
In-Reply-To: <p04330107bb3ef351a9aa at EIM-Mac-1.0.7>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Message: 8
>
> >That is what VE6HF was sending each time I worked him. He is
> >also in Zone 02. Is "R2" a special mult, or was this just his way of
> >saying he is in IARU Zone 02?
>
> I worked G3BJ, who was giving "R1". I assumed that they were some
> sort of IARU representative stations for their respective ITU Regions?
>
Has anyone read the rules?
5. Contest Exchange:
5.1. IARU member society HQ stations send signal report and official IARU
member society abbreviation. IARU International Secretariat club station
NU1AW counts as a HQ station. Members of the IARU Administrative Council and
the three IARU regional Executive committees send "AC," "R1,""R2," and "R3"
as appropriate.
5.2. All others send signal report and ITU zone.
5.3 A complete exchange must be logged for each valid QSO.
....
8. Multipliers: The total number of ITU zones plus IARU member society HQ
stations worked on each band (not mode.) IARU officials represent a maximum
of four multipliers per band (AC, R1, R2 and R3).
73,
dale, kg5u
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 07:26:45 -0400
From: Bob Patten <n4bp at bellsouth.net>
To: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Cabrillo Format for RTTY NAQP
Message-ID: <3F1A7C75.2030708 at bellsouth.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Message: 9
Can someone e-mail me privately the required format for this NCJ
contest. I used MMTTY barefoot
and it doesn't output a useable log. If I can create one with an
editor, I may try it, but it's a hefty log..
Need to know basically what column each of the required fields use.
--
73, Bob Patten, N4BP Plantation, FL
E-Mail: n4bp at arrl.net Website: http://www.qsl.net/n4bp
QRP ARCI #3412 SOC #1 ARS #799 Whiners #6 FISTS #7871
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
End of CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 7, Issue 29
*****************************************
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list