[CQ-Contest] ...is it really worth it?
Jim White, K4OJ
k4oj at tampabay.rr.com
Thu Jun 5 17:08:03 EDT 2003
Packet usage in the WPX, that is...
While it was a very small m-s effort (20 hrs) in the CW WPX contest a
few weeks ago I just could not see firing up the spot sucker computer...
Other than seeing spots of DX on the lower bands (where the points are)
as a North American US entrant it just doesn't seem to be worth the
distraction when a mult can be a WB1 or it could be a PJ2...and the
chance of a WB1 calling in response to a loud CQ is high... of course I
did not borrow a spark plug call for the contest, either.
Then again I am an of the old school (WWOC # 2) and I tune the radio as
opposed to waiting for a pop up to tell me to work something... if I was
doing both I guess I would be better off - it just does not seem that
for this contest it is nearly as important to hunt multipliers.
I do enjoy this contest as a North American as it is a work everyone
contest and the potential for a new mult is to some extent extremely
dependant on how your station performs domestically which I have worked
on for SS and NAQP, NAS, etc...
Perhaps someone has done an analysis of mults vs QSOs of the Top Ten in
this contest and could chime in with their findings... it always amazes
me when some of the multipliers calling in get a flag late in the
contest - things like WB2 can all of the sudden be "important"
Like any contest the secret to being a winner is a full understanding of
what it takes to win - and for a NA entrant that includes working those
WB1's and WB2's!
Then again I could be having a senior moment and this could have been
all over the reflector and this OM has had an attack of multhunters
disease...
73,
Jim, K4OJ
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list