Fw: [CQ-Contest] Callsign Advantages

[Rex Maner]

PLEASE DON'T Pick any call with QQ or any combination in them
QUACK

----- Original Message -----
From: "KØHB" <k0hb at earthlink.net>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 22:17
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Callsign Advantages


> If you're primarily a CW contester, try to find a call with little or no
dits
> ....  my call is HORRIBLE as the dits get lost in the noise.  Thus a call
like
> K8MM, K8TTT, or something similar would be preferable.  For voice
contesting,
> try to think of something with strong phonetics.  Some phonetics like
bravo,
> alfa, and papa seem to be "soft" sounding, while tango, zulu, mike, and
kilo
> seem have a "presence" which stands above the noise.
>
> ô¿ô  73, de Hans, K0HB
> --
>   Help support youth involved in Amateur Radio.
>   http://www.mnyarc.org
>   http://www.k0bsa.org
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sean-K8KHZ" <Sean at k8khz.com>
> To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:39 AM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Callsign Advantages
>
>
> > I have been a contester for really about 2-3 years. I was when I first
> > started out. KC8MPQ. WHEW I got that all out. now I am K8KHZ. I have
thought
> > about changing it again to another call area or something with a better
> > prefix. something that might catch the ear of others. But is it all
worth it
> > at all? What is your thought on this.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>     The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
> THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
>        http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>