[CQ-Contest]
Re: DX Box Scores in ARRL 160 Meter Contest (was RE: ARRL 160 Meter
Scores?)
Pat Collins
pat at linuxcolumbus.com
Sun May 25 21:38:31 EDT 2003
On Sat, 2003-05-24 at 19:17, Jeff Maass wrote:
> I *knew* when I typed that line and mentioned QRP that I'd be
> hearing from you, Pat!
>
> My point is this: no one gets on during the ARRL 160m Contest
> saying "Gee, it'll be a good chance to get a few new QRP stations
> in the log". OTOH, more than a few of the "non-serious" W/VE
> guys get on the air during the contest period explicitly looking for
> a few new DX countries, and work other W/VE stations along the
> way. More DX operators should be *encouraged* to participate!
>
I never said you were wrong about the lack of dx recognition, but it
seems that you have a beef with qrp'ers getting recognition. I request
that your suggestions not be to eliminate ANY qrp coverage in ANY
contest. To eliminate qrp recognition in any major contest is a bad
idea.
Furthmore, I typically hear lots of DX stations calling CQ or calling
US/VE stations with no response. Having been on the dx side in a 160
contest (TI in 1995) I know what it is like to not be heard, so I don't
blame the dx for not getting on. Adding a DX top ten list will do
nothing to increase dx participation if that is your point.
The ARRL 160 contest has been and will always be a stateside only
contest with dx used to give the east coast the advantage in winning.
But, I enjoy it none the less.
Pat N8VW
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list