[CQ-Contest] WW CW comments
Timo Klimoff
timo.klimoff at dnainternet.net
Fri Sep 5 08:29:08 EDT 2003
> Did somebody notice that comments published in Sep.2003 CQ magazine are
actually
> CQ WW CW 2001 comments (not 2002 contest)?
>
Also web site has old comments:
http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/WW%20CW%20QRM%20WEB%20Sept%2003%2081203.pdf
(and still missing multi op station operators - removing them from magazine
was a stupid idea)
CW breakdowns - at least SOAB Europe - have several errors, breakdowns of
4U1ITU and OH1F are propably totally wrong (I would like to see correct
versions somewhere, breakdowns are the most important info of results - it
helps to analyse and estimate if you operated/going to operate in the same
class). Magazine also claims G0IVZ as an Eu winner (and trophy winner) on
20m with the score 653.805 - on the other hand OH0Z has 833.360 under the
Aland Islands.
Web and contest reflectors would be very visible and easy way to correct the
errors!
73, Timo OH1NOA
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list