[CQ-Contest] ANOTHER SMELLY SUBJECT

[Gerry Hull]

Bill,

You missed my point completely.  If you loose a contest to a identifiable,
proven cheater, ABSOLUTELY the community should call this person to task (it
is up to contest committees to decide if a disqualification is necessary).
However, the majority of blather on this reflector is about complaints, not
about solutions. K1TTT's great work on self-spotters is pretty fool proof.
Name-calling about who runs power is not.  
Identify cheaters and root them out -- don't name call and provide innuendo.
(oh, gee, maybe that's what internet
Reflectors are for? :-) )   

73,

Gerry, W1VE/VE1RM

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Turner [mailto:wrt at dslextreme.com] 
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 11:54 AM
To: Gerry Hull
Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ANOTHER SMELLY SUBJECT

On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 11:02:26 -0400, Gerry Hull wrote:

>How about competing to the best of your station and personal abilities, 
>and be happy with your own result?
>If you are not happy with the result, work on your station and skills.
>Don't whine about the cheaters!

_________________________________________________________

Rubbish.  Cheaters not only win, they force the good guys to lose.
Cheaters should be rooted out and exposed as much as possible.  I can't
believe Mr. Hull's comments; an invitation to anarchy.

--
Bill, W6WRT
QSLs via LoTW