[CQ-Contest] FCC's NPRM on BPL

[Ron Notarius WN3VAW]

Jukka,

In a word:  Yes.

But it's easier & cheaper for the BPL proponents to try and get the FCC
rules pertaining to their spurious emissions specifications changed, under
the guise of "streamlining" FCC regulations, than to actually try and solve
the problem of spurious emissions... if it can be fixed, which I for one
doubt...

73, ron wn3vaw

"Badgers?  Badgers!?!  BADGERS!?!?!  We don't need no stinkin' BADGERS!"
-- Raoul, Raoul's Wild Kingdom, "UHF"

----- Original Message -----
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:03:47 +0300
From: <jukka.klemola at nokia.com>
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] FCC's NPRM on BPL
To: <W4EF at dellroy.com>, <antennaware at contesting.com>,
<cq-contest at contesting.com>, <ct-user at contesting.com>,
<frc at gofrc.org>, <1000mp at mailman.qth.net>, <na-user at contesting.com>,
<rfi at contesting.com>, <rtty at contesting.com>,
<towertalk at contesting.com>, <writelog at contesting.com>,
<yaesu at contesting.com>, <yccc at yccc.org>, <k2qmf at juno.com>

Does BPL make power network a telecommunications network?

Telecom networks have all sorts of spurious emission
specifications to fulfill.


73,
Jukka OH6LI

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of ext
> Michael Tope
> Sent: 27 April, 2004 05:32
> To: antennaware at contesting.com; cq-contest at contesting.com;
> ct-user at contesting.com; frc at gofrc.org; 1000mp at mailman.qth.net;
> na-user at contesting.com; rfi at contesting.com; rtty at contesting.com;
> towertalk at contesting.com; writelog at contesting.com;
> yaesu at contesting.com;
> yccc at yccc.org; k2qmf at juno.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] FCC's NPRM on BPL
>
>
>
> Before you comment, I strongly urge everyone to read David
> Sumner's recent suggestions for filing "Thoughtful, Considered"
> comments in response to the FCC NPRM on BPL. From the
> ARRL website:
>
> http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/03/24/3/?nc=1
>
> While venting emotional comments like "BPL is stupid", or
> "BPL is going to trash our hams bands" may make you feel
> better, they'll make us all sound like a bunch of yahoos with
> antennas taped to our heads. This will just diminish our
> collective position. If you don't have anything intelligent to
> say, save your breath and send some money to the ARRL,
> so that they can say it for you.
>
> 73 de Mike, W4EF..............................................
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <k2qmf at juno.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 4:37 PM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] FCC's NPRM on BPL
>
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Everyone should make a comment regarding the
> > NPRM from the FCC  It is very easy to do..
> >
> > go to      http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/ecfs/Upload/
> >
> > Make sure you use a capital U in Upload/
> >
> > It is very easy...    DO IT NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!
> >
> > 73,  Ted  K2QMF
> >
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>     The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
> THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
>        http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest