[CQ-Contest] Advantages not created equal
Richard DiDonna NN3W
NN3W at prodigy.net
Tue Aug 17 23:16:23 EDT 2004
Well, for one, Field Day.
Rich NN3W
--- Original Message ---
From: Bill Coleman <aa4lr at arrl.net>
To: Roy Maull <rmaull at charter.net>
CC: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Advantages not created equal
>
>On Aug 17, 2004, at 9:42 AM, Roy Maull wrote:
>
>> The ten minute rule was applied to the SO
class to squash the
>> "so called" SO2R advantage.
>
>What contest implements a 10 minute rule for single
operators?
>
>> It originated for the MOST class with multiple
radios to preclude
>> their operating much like a MOMT station.
>> Although the SO2R station was
inconvenienced a bit by this
>> rule, the true SO1R small station that primarily
works S&P was the
>> most severely impacted. It hampers the flexibility
needed to maximize
>> the score by chasing mults from band to band as
needed.
>> I have always considered this the worst
rule ever applied to
>> the SO class.
>
>There's no need to limit the band changes for single
operators. The
>operator is the limitation, not band changes.
>
>
>Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail:
aa4lr at arrl.net
>Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever
fly!"
> -- Wilbur Wright, 1901
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-
contest
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list