[CQ-Contest] Re: CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 24, Issue 21
Eddie
kc5ter at sbcglobal.net
Fri Dec 3 15:38:40 EST 2004
ya know guys if every operator on this list put as much effort in to
...(actually trying to further our hobby) in areas that REALLY mattered
then.... we..being all hams would not be looked at as a dieing breed???
----- Original Message -----
From: <cq-contest-request at contesting.com>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 1:34 PM
Subject: CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 24, Issue 21
> Send CQ-Contest mailing list submissions to
> cq-contest at contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cq-contest-request at contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cq-contest-owner at contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CQ-Contest digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Stimulating Participation (Russell Hill)
> 2. Re: scores - final thought (Tom Osborne)
> 3. RE: Stimulating Participation (K0HB )
> 4. Re: Chiming in -- SO2R (Bill Turner)
> 5. Re: scores - final thought (K0HB )
> 6. Re: QST...A radical thought? (Ward Silver)
> 7. RE: QST...A radical thought? (Eric Hilding)
> 8. Re: QST...A radical thought? (Ward Silver)
> 9. Like to ID a TS-950 Which model do I have?? (K7VS Van)
> 10. Follow-up Line Scores (N7MAL)
> 11. Re: scores - final thought (John Geiger)
> 12. RE: Follow-up Line Scores (K0HB )
> 13. Re: Follow-up Line Scores (John Geiger)
> 14. Re: Follow-up Line Scores (Russell Hill)
> 15. THANKS FOR THE TS-950 INFO TO ALL! (K7VS Van)
> 16. Re: scores - final thought (Russell Hill)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:05:39 -0600
> From: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation
> To: "dt" <pattaya at direcpc.com>, <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <015d01c4d95a$50f5b320$28d0f218 at RCHill>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=response
>
> The parade has the different circumstance of having city policemen keeping
> folks out of the parade route, with the aid of barricades.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dt" <pattaya at direcpc.com>
> To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 8:25 AM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation
>
>
>> Bob, k8kwt
>>
>> Marlene and I are in that group calling cq from WD5R.
>> Just want you to know, we understand the problem.
>> Even with a fair station set up here, we hesitate to put ourselves in a
>> position of
>> having to 'relocate' during the contest.
>> We try to establish a calling frequency before the contest starts and we
>> are just plain hard headed about hanging on to it.
>> Primarily because we do not enjoy looking for some spot that appears
>> susceptible to bulling tactics.
>> We'd like to see the 'band plan' handled like 'main street' is handled on
>> special occasions.
>> Close down all the businesses not required for the special occasion, and
>> anyone that is not in the parade, is simply a spectator.
>> Make 160 a cw band for cw contests, make 160 a ssb band for ssb contests,
>> and put everything back to normal after the contest.
>> This works for parades in the big cities, no reason it couldn't work for
>> contesting.
>> Come to think of it, guess it wouldn't work because it would eliminate
>> too
>> many subjects for debate.
>>
>> The Big stations make the 'boom, boom, boom,
>> The weak signals in the noise makes the music,
>>
>> Doug, n5ect
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 09:20:15 -0800
> From: "Tom Osborne" <w7why at charter.net>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] scores - final thought
> To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <003101c4d95c$5ca74060$a83f7644 at TomOsborne>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
>
> I guess that means I will have to put a computer in the "throne room"
> for my activities in there. 73
> Tom W7WHY
>
> _________________________________________________
>
>> at what point will QST no longer be sent thru the mail and only be
> available on-line? then they can "publish" a 400 page "magazine" each
> and every month and i can print out any article i wish. won't that be
> great? no more stacks of magazines in the corner, just a folder on a
> CD i burned in a stack of other digital books.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:23:47 -00
> From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb at earthlink.net>
> Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation
> To: "dt" <pattaya at direcpc.com>, cq-contest at contesting.com
> Message-ID: <410-220041253172347796 at earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
>
>
>> [Original Message]
>> From: dt <pattaya at direcpc.com>
>
>> Close down all the businesses not required for the special occasion,
>> and anyone that is not in the parade, is simply a spectator.
>
> Doug,
>
> You're joking, right? Seriously proposing this idea would gain us more
> enemies than if the Baptists closed all the beer joints in Wisconsin!
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>
> --
> http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:23:54 -0800
> From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242 at ispwest.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Chiming in -- SO2R
> To: k-zero-hb at earthlink.net
> Cc: dennis o'connor <k8do at mailblocks.com>, cq-contest at contesting.com
> Message-ID: <4881r0poenmi7va5r6nrijesh612fjtoik at 4ax.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:22:56 -00, K0HB wrote:
>
>>That's UNFAIR!!!!!!! We need a SEPARATE CATEGORY for guys like him.
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
> There already is. It's called FIRST PLACE, just as it should be.
>
> --
> Bill W6WRT
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.4 - Release Date: 11/30/2004
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:25:40 -00
> From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] scores - final thought
> To: "Tom Osborne" <w7why at charter.net>, "CQ Contest"
> <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <410-220041253172540875 at earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
>
>>
>> I guess that means I will have to put a computer in the "throne room"
>> for my activities in there. 73
>> Tom W7WHY
>>
>
> Or move the throne into the ham-shack?
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> --
> http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 09:31:02 -0800
> From: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil at centurytel.net>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought?
> To: "CQ-Contest Reflector" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <008901c4d95d$df4f5240$7ca9fea9 at WardsNotebook>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>> Perhaps the answer to this line score thing is to offer a QST
>> subscription
>> in two forms. One would be the traditional hard copy in its present
> form.
>> The other would be an on-line version with expanded line scores as well
> as
>> traffic reports and all the stuff the ARRL says can't be put in QST
> because of
>> page limitations.
>>
>> Prices would either be the same or would be cheaper for the on line
> version.
>> To limit access of the on-line version, I'm sure the computer geeks
> among
>> us have excellent ways to limit access to only subscribers.
>
> And this differs from the current situation how? As I see it, you
> currently
> get BOTH of these options from your current membership: QST in traditional
> form and access by members to the full and complete Web-based information.
> This includes the traditional format of writeup+line scores as a
> downloadable PDF document. Members get access to complete information
> while
> non-members get summarized information.
>
>> How this would affect advertising? That's a good question, best
> addressed
>> by N0AX.
>
> Actually, I have little administrative input or knowledge of this sort of
> detail - I just write 'em and red-pencil 'em.
>
>> Everybody would be happy, the traffic guys, the little pistols, the big
>> pistols and maybe even the staff at headquarters.
>>
>> I am going to the Tampa hamfest tomorrow and mention this to the guys
>> from
>> ARRL who will be there and see what their thoughts are.
>>
>> Bill K4XS
>
> Here's an idea I have proposed that has not been turned down outright, but
> may require some software development (read, expenditure of tight $$).
>
> For every submitter of a log, give them the opportunity to receive an
> email
> with a link to the downloadable PDF document with the complete results
> when
> they become available. Click it and get it. Additionally, put a check
> box
> on their membership account page that would enable them to receive the
> same
> email whenever any results become available. (This wouldn't just be
> contest
> results, but writeups on special events, emergency tests, traffic handling
> summaries, and so on.) There are a number of ways to get the information
> in
> front of the ARRL member. It just occurred to me that this sort of link
> could also go into the ARRL Letter. Put people one click away from the
> results and they will get read.
>
> It could be extended to the idea of sending an email to every ARRL member
> whose validated call appears in the final data base. It's a "Simple
> Matter
> of Programming" - the four most dangerous (and expensive) words in the
> English language. Imagine - "Dear WX1XXX - thank you for participating in
> the ARRL's ABCD contest. Please click [link] to receive a copy of the
> complete contest results. We hope to see you in the next one! For more
> information about contesting and contest organizations in your area,
> please
> click [link]." I ask you if that wouldn't be powerful to a 20-, 30-,
> 40-something ham that represents the next generation of contesting?
>
> Ooh - another good idea. (How much coffee *did* I put in the machine this
> morning?) Include a link to the log search engine so that the reader could
> go immediately to a sorted list that finds their call and shows the
> results
> sorted by region, category, and score. I.e. - Sort of a Super Check Line
> Score - "Click [link] to see your score."
>
> Bear in mind that the ARRL is (rightly) concerned about sending unwanted
> emails to members so would have to be handled correctly and with full
> member
> approval of any automatic mailings. Furthermore, none of this can
> increase
> magazine costs - the money just isn't there. However, a well-defined
> package of software tasks based on existing functions has a chance of
> getting done.
>
> Nevertheless, the mechanics of information distribution is sufficient that
> it would be easy to put electronic line scores in front of readers. If
> you
> absolutely have to have the printed page, so be it.
>
> 73, Ward N0AX
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 10:05:34 -0800
> From: Eric Hilding <dx35 at hilding.com>
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] RE: QST...A radical thought?
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Cc: hwardsil at centurytel.net
> Message-ID: <4.2.2.20041203100105.00a8e550 at mail.garlic.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> Ward, N0AX brilliantly suggested:
>
> > Here's an idea I have proposed that has not been turned down outright,
> > but
> > may require some software development (read, expenditure of tight $$).
> >
> > For every submitter of a log, give them the opportunity to receive an
> > email
> > with a link to the downloadable PDF document with the complete results
> > when
> > they become available. Click it and get it. Additionally, put a check
> > box
> > on their membership account page that would enable them to receive the
> > same
> > email whenever any results become available.
>
> Another brilliant idea, Ward, and it is *not* a "Programming Nightmare".
>
> I like your "radical" thinking, OM! The only option I would add is one to
> insure that a separate email address (from a membership email address)
> could be used for whatever auto/filter/filing/sorting desires one might
> have.
>
> 73...
>
> Rick, K6VVA
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:09:57 -0800
> From: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil at centurytel.net>
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Re: QST...A radical thought?
> To: "CQ-Contest Reflector" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <012a01c4d963$4f090f40$7ca9fea9 at WardsNotebook>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> It may be that a "send emails here" window would be required. All this
> stuff exists in one form or another on the Web site, which lowers
> development costs dramatically, as well as the cost of verification.
> Sorry,
> lapsing into engineering-speak...I have avoided using the words
> "requirements" and "validation", but I
> don't...think...I...can...hold...out...much...longerrrrrrr...
>
> 73, Ward N0AX
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Hilding" <dx35 at hilding.com>
> To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Cc: <hwardsil at centurytel.net>
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 10:05 AM
> Subject: RE: QST...A radical thought?
>
>
>> Ward, N0AX brilliantly suggested:
>>
>> > Here's an idea I have proposed that has not been turned down outright,
> but
>> > may require some software development (read, expenditure of tight $$).
>> >
>> > For every submitter of a log, give them the opportunity to receive an
> email
>> > with a link to the downloadable PDF document with the complete results
> when
>> > they become available. Click it and get it. Additionally, put a
>> check
> box
>> > on their membership account page that would enable them to receive the
> same
>> > email whenever any results become available.
>>
>> Another brilliant idea, Ward, and it is *not* a "Programming Nightmare".
>>
>> I like your "radical" thinking, OM! The only option I would add is one
>> to
>> insure that a separate email address (from a membership email address)
>> could be used for whatever auto/filter/filing/sorting desires one might
> have.
>>
>> 73...
>>
>> Rick, K6VVA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:14:45 -0800
> From: "K7VS Van" <wa7fab at cdsnet.net>
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Like to ID a TS-950 Which model do I have??
> To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <000a01c4d963$f803ba00$0a00a8c0 at maincomputer>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Just acquired a TS-950 and not sure which model I have. Mine says TS-950S
> Digital. I understand that Kenwood made more than one model of this
> radio.
> The one I have reads across the top of the cabinet TS-950S Digital. It
> does
> have some filters in it and the digital features. Is this what is
> commonly
> called the FT-950SDX radio or is it an earlier model? The manual seems to
> be for two models. One called FT-950S and the other described as the
> FT-950S Digital. Did they evenually made three models of this radio?
> Thanks for any help. Van, K7VS
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 18:23:31 -0000
> From: "N7MAL" <N7MAL at CITLINK.NET>
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Follow-up Line Scores
> To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <001301c4d965$3312a240$6400a8c0 at n7mal7>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I am now in receipt of several documents relating to publishing line
> scores. I only gave them a cursory glance because like any good contester
> I have antenna wok to do before the contest starts this afternoon.
> My first impression, however, is to throw my QST in the fireplace.
> Does anyone remember what year line scores were dropped from QST?
> There is a very informative story in the June QST which says almost 1/3 of
> the ARRL membership doesn't want contesting 'stuff' in the magazine while
> only 7% want it.
>
> What would be the ramification if overnight 7% of the QST circulation
> vanished?
>
> Why am I a member of the ARRL when almost 1/3 of the membership doesn't
> want me and my kind(contesters) around?
>
>
> MAL N7MAL
> BULLHEAD CITY, AZ
> http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:40:21 -0800 (PST)
> From: John Geiger <johngeig at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] scores - final thought
> To: k-zero-hb at earthlink.net, Tom Osborne <w7why at charter.net>, CQ
> Contest <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <20041203184021.8906.qmail at web54701.mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Yeah, but then doesn't that put you in a new contest
> category because you can operate when others can't?
> Like single op-really assisted.
>
> John NE0P
>
> --- K0HB <k-zero-hb at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> >
>> > I guess that means I will have to put a computer
>> in the "throne room"
>> > for my activities in there. 73
>> > Tom W7WHY
>> >
>>
>> Or move the throne into the ham-shack?
>>
>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>> --
>> http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 18:44:02 -00
> From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb at earthlink.net>
> Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Follow-up Line Scores
> To: "N7MAL" <N7MAL at CITLINK.NET>, cq-contest at contesting.com
> Message-ID: <410-22004125318442906 at earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
>
>> [Original Message]
>> From: N7MAL <N7MAL at CITLINK.NET>
>
>>
>> Why am I a member of the ARRL when almost 1/3 of
>> the membership doesn't want me and my kind(contesters)
>> around?
>>
>
> If the only reason you're an ARRL member is because you want to see your
> call letters printed in QST, then perhaps there is no justification for
> your membership. Join some other national amateur organization instead.
> (Good luck on this one, now!)
>
> While I'd love to see the return of line scores and section news to QST
> (and can be very pesky to my Director about that topic), it is only one
> minor (VERY minor) negative alongside all the good reasons for my support
> of ARRL.
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:45:27 -0800 (PST)
> From: John Geiger <johngeig at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Follow-up Line Scores
> To: N7MAL <N7MAL at CITLINK.NET>, cq-contest at contesting.com
> Message-ID: <20041203184527.12115.qmail at web54701.mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> I think it would be interesting to find out how many
> of that 1/3 have actually been on the air in the past
> year, or been on something other than 2 meter FM or
> packet (which the ARRL plays to). They probably don't
> know the first think about contesting or contesters
> but think they aren't supposed to like them because of
> an email they have seen, or a thread on eham.net that
> says that contesters tie up an entire band that they
> don't operate on anyway
>
> 73s John NE0P
>
> --- N7MAL <N7MAL at CITLINK.NET> wrote:
>
>> I am now in receipt of several documents relating to
>> publishing line scores. I only gave them a cursory
>> glance because like any good contester I have
>> antenna wok to do before the contest starts this
>> afternoon.
>> My first impression, however, is to throw my QST in
>> the fireplace.
>> Does anyone remember what year line scores were
>> dropped from QST?
>> There is a very informative story in the June QST
>> which says almost 1/3 of the ARRL membership doesn't
>> want contesting 'stuff' in the magazine while only
>> 7% want it.
>>
>> What would be the ramification if overnight 7% of
>> the QST circulation vanished?
>>
>> Why am I a member of the ARRL when almost 1/3 of the
>> membership doesn't want me and my kind(contesters)
>> around?
>>
>>
>> MAL N7MAL
>> BULLHEAD CITY, AZ
>> http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
> http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:17:35 -0600
> From: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Follow-up Line Scores
> To: "N7MAL" <N7MAL at CITLINK.NET>, <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <004701c4d96c$bece1a10$28d0f218 at RCHill>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> There may be a difference between "doesn't want" as in "doesn't care" on
> the
> one hand and "wishes for it not to be there" on the other.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "N7MAL" <N7MAL at CITLINK.NET>
> To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 12:23 PM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Follow-up Line Scores
>
>
> I am now in receipt of several documents relating to publishing line
> scores.
> I only gave them a cursory glance because like any good contester I have
> antenna wok to do before the contest starts this afternoon.
> My first impression, however, is to throw my QST in the fireplace.
> Does anyone remember what year line scores were dropped from QST?
> There is a very informative story in the June QST which says almost 1/3 of
> the ARRL membership doesn't want contesting 'stuff' in the magazine while
> only 7% want it.
>
> What would be the ramification if overnight 7% of the QST circulation
> vanished?
>
> Why am I a member of the ARRL when almost 1/3 of the membership doesn't
> want
> me and my kind(contesters) around?
>
>
> MAL N7MAL
> BULLHEAD CITY, AZ
> http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:20:38 -0800
> From: "K7VS Van" <wa7fab at cdsnet.net>
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] THANKS FOR THE TS-950 INFO TO ALL!
> To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <000d01c4d96d$2dd1bfc0$0a00a8c0 at maincomputer>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> APPRECIATE THE RESPONSES. VAN, K7VS
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:33:54 -0600
> From: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] scores - final thought
> To: "John Geiger" <johngeig at yahoo.com>, <k-zero-hb at earthlink.net>,
> "Tom Osborne" <w7why at charter.net>, "CQ Contest"
> <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <004d01c4d96f$0679f670$28d0f218 at RCHill>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Naah-- that is a category almost all of us can enter-- regardless of deed
> restrictions and covenants....
>
> Admittedly some of us might claim certain disadvantages of one sort or
> another....
>
> Another illustration of the importance of diet, before and during....
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Geiger" <johngeig at yahoo.com>
> To: <k-zero-hb at earthlink.net>; "Tom Osborne" <w7why at charter.net>; "CQ
> Contest" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 12:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] scores - final thought
>
>
>> Yeah, but then doesn't that put you in a new contest
>> category because you can operate when others can't?
>> Like single op-really assisted.
>>
>> John NE0P
>>
>> --- K0HB <k-zero-hb at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > I guess that means I will have to put a computer
>>> in the "throne room"
>>> > for my activities in there. 73
>>> > Tom W7WHY
>>> >
>>>
>>> Or move the throne into the ham-shack?
>>>
>>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>> --
>>> http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>>
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________
>> Do you Yahoo!?
>> Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
>> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> End of CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 24, Issue 21
> ******************************************
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.803 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list