[CQ-Contest] ARRL v. contesters

[John Geiger]

Yeah, but from what their representatives told K4XS,
they really don't care about us either.  They are too
busy focusing on the no-code 2 meter ham.  I would
assume that the percentage of contesters who belong to
the ARRL is much higher than the percentage of no-code
2 meter hams who belong, and this is how they thank
you for your loyality.

73s John NE0P
An extra class-HF operating contesting DXing ham that
the ARRL could care less about.


--- Bill Turner <dezrat1242 at ispwest.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:47:51 -0800, Kenneth E. Harker
> wrote:
> 
> >ARRL is by no means anti-contesting, as some have
> suggested.
> 
>
_________________________________________________________
> 
> The ARRL is headed in that direction, though.  Like
> a car going
> downhill with no brakes, everything seems fine for
> now...
> 
> --
> Bill W6WRT
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.6 - Release
> Date: 12/5/2004
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo