[CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location

[Richard DiDonna NN3W]

This is true.

Nonetheless, some choose to report the info; others do 
not.  And, the information is not the official data 
(i.e., you could say for QTH, QTH as Texas).

On the other hand, the ARRL information is the 
official claimed information for scoring and awards 
purposes.

Finally, not everybody who submits a log to ARRL 
submits a 3830 report.  But, everybody who does submit 
a ARRL log, is claiming that their information is 
correct and as accurate as possible (the only 
exception being checkloggers who report their log only 
as a checklog).

Rich NN3W
--- Original Message ---
From: "John WA2GO" <xnewyorka at hotmail.com>
To: NN3W at prodigy.net, johngeig at yahoo.com, 
w9wi at earthlink.net, cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location

>>>I think that somebody really needs to tell Dan 
Henderson or whomever is 
>>>the contest/web guy at ARRLto supress any 
information that could have been 
>>>used in the exchange (except for the obvious - the 
callsign).
>>>There's too much ability to do some post-log 
massaging and error 
>>>elimination.
>
>
>And if the ARRL obliges, I guess the person who 
maintains the 3830 reflector 
>software also will have to suppress the display of 
the SECTION and the 
>PRECEDENCE until after the log submission deadline 
(or even permanently?) 
>when displaying Sweepstakes logs, right??
>
>Wa(y)-2-Go
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-
contest