[CQ-Contest] More NCJ Sprints ???

[Bob Naumann - N5NJ]

Please note that my use of the word "sane" was unintentional!


Also, my mis-spelling of the word "interval" which is much less humorous was also unintentional.

-N5NJ
============================================================
From: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj at gte.net>
Date: 2004/02/10 Tue AM 07:14:34 CST
To: "Michael Dinkelman" <mwdink at eskimo.com>, 
	cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] More NCJ  Sprints ???

RE: Internet Sprint

The other significant difference was that you could work the sane station again following an inteval - I recall 5 minutes?

N5NJ

> ------------Original Message------------
> From: Michael Dinkelman <mwdink at eskimo.com>
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Date: Tue, Feb-10-2004 6:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] More NCJ  Sprints ???
> 
> 
> For those who never did one, the INTERNET Sprints were
> organized on a short term basis, announced via the internet
> (NO, you didn't work via the internet), and all logs
> were submitted via the internet. They followed the basic
> format of the Sprints but there were some differences, the most
> interesting being that you changed your name based on the
> previous contact you made. So, if I (dink) worked Bob,
> he would use dink as his name for the next Q and I would
> use Bob. Sometimes you got your name back, but
> frequently names got mashed quickly and part
> of the fun was the ability of Tree (I believe) to have
> software that tracked the movement of names in submitted logs.
> Tracing the names and watching them change in the reports
> he generated provided a lot in insight to the importance
> of copying exchanges correctly and wipes out the
> advantage of master call lists. If the name became
> truly mangeled or offensive, you were allowed to start a
> new name mid-stream as long as you recorded the change.
> 
> I wouldn't be surprised if it was the work involved in
> doing this that killed the I-Sprint though I don't have
> that first hand. It was also VERY important that EVERYONE
> submit a log or the tracing becomes impossible. Ward, N0AX
> also organized some special I-Sprints a few years ago but
> they also fell by the wayside <sigh>.
> 
> The question is, do the few e-mails passed along on this
> thread really reflect a wide interest in reviving traditional
> I-Sprints (or a variation) or just a few rabid contesters still
> pumped from the last two weeks? :>)
> 
> brings back pleasant memories...
> 73
> dink
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> At 06:44 PM 2/9/2004 -0500, R Johnson wrote:
> >What "Name Changing Rule" ???
> >I downloaded the NA Sprint rules from the NCJ web site and I don't see it.
> >What Rule # was it ???
> >
> >73
> >Bob, K1VU
> >
> >At 17:30 2/9/2004 , Torsten Clay wrote:
> > >Yes,  the name-changing rule was lots of fun, you never knew if your name
> > >would come back to you.  Makes copying the exchange a little less
> > >trivial...
> > >
> > >Tor
> > >N4OGW
> > >
> > > > Maybe it's time to consider the "Internet"
> > > > Sprints again?
> > > >
> > > > dink
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>     The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
> THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
>        http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------
    The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
       http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
============================================================