[CQ-Contest] Contesting bandwidth

Jim Monahan K1PX at msn.com
Sat Jan 17 19:07:26 EST 2004


I'm essentially convinced that there is no real solution to this issue of contesting and
non-contesters.

Years ago, I had a racing car and I believe that this situation is somewhat akin to holding
racing events on public roads along with regular traffic. Fortunately, face cars have their
own tracks or, in some cases, run on public roads with all other traffic closed down.

The problem reflects our society, unfortunately in this respect, where you have drivers
who drive like they own the road rather then their cars complete with unpleasant gestures
if you at all challenge their actions.

It seems that many of us (general population) live in our own little world and don't want it
affected by other activities. Intolerance seems to abound!

As an example that I'm sure we all have experienced, I made the mistake of getting on 75 
meters recently, which I seldom do, to have a QSO with an old friend. 

I moved from the first frequency because the group, and I knew one of the operators, meets
there and I was unaware of it.

On the new frequency, 3821,  after about 20 or 30 minutes, we were suddenly besieged with
carriers and comments. I asked if someone wanted to join us and was told that this was "their" frequency. They were waiting for us to sign so they could get on with their group.

So much for having a chat with my friend!

I suppose I understand that some people get on the same frequency every day at the same
time and talk about the same thing.

The problem, of course, with allocating part of the bands is that it can't be enforced. The FCC
would never do that or even consider it.

The best we can do, in the heat of competition, is try to act as ladies and gentlemen and hopefully
some of this may rub off on other operators. Maybe not.

73, Jim, K1PX

K1PX at msn.com<mailto:K1PX at msn.com>



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list