[CQ-Contest] Sharing Radio Spectrum and Roads
Bob Naumann - N5NJ
n5nj at gte.net
Sun Jan 18 14:13:14 EST 2004
K1TTT said:
>>> ... during rush hour in many areas certain lanes are restricted to mult=
i passenger vehicles only. Maybe we should make a push for allocating non-=
ragchew and non-net segments of bands so we can have clear spectrum! <<<
Following this analogy further, these new cleared out "lanes" of spectrum w=
ould be for multi-ops only? And, the authorities would closely monitor who=
goes in and out of these lanes, to assure that only multi-ops use them.
Sounds great to me!
N5NJ
P.S. Even with the HOV variance, I think the traffic analogy is a good one=
. Regarding emergency traffic - what contester would deliberately not give=
clearance to an actual emergency? That said, I do not equate a net that e=
xists "in case there is an emergency" to qualify for special treatment unde=
r any circumstances - aside from that rare occurance when an emergency actu=
ally is happening.
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list