[CQ-Contest] Interesting new rule in EUHFC 2004

[Ron Notarius]

No, I don't like this "interesting new rule" at all.  It sets a very bad
precedent.

Now I may be at best a little fish in the proverbial pond, but at least at
the "local" level (such as the WPA section in ARRL contests, or the state of
PA in other contests, for example) I can be competitive.  And I can do so...
or at least I could do so when I still had my old QTH... with a decent (if
not top of the line) rig by working on improving my antennas and my skills.

But the affect of this "interesting" rule is to disqualify my from any
chance of a plaque (as opposed to the miniscule chance I had before) unless
I buy a new(er) transceiver that happens to have a computer interface to
permit my contest software to record the "exact" frequency.  And since my
software covers most but not all rigs, that also limits my choice to a rig
on the list... which may disqualify some of the newer rigs or newest rigs
that the software may not work with.

No thanks.  I'll join Tim in that beer instead.

73, ron wn3vaw

----- Original Message ----- 
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 17:33:35 +0100
> From: CT1BOH - Jos? Carlos Cardoso Nunes <ct1boh at sapo.pt>
> Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Interesting new rule in EUHFC 2004
> To: "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <NGBBIFBCCLEJMKIJMONGKEJBCGAA.ct1boh at sapo.pt>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
>
> Timo
>
> Why do you think this happens?
> If you think, you will quickly realize a good way to catch cheating is to
> look at the QSO's frequencies.
>
> I wish this would be a standard obligation for log submission for all the
> contests, for top logs.
>
> 73
> José Nunes
> CT1BOH
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Timo Klimoff
> Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 15:28
> To: CQ-Contest
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Interesting new rule in EUHFC 2004
>
>
> "It is strongly recommended to write exact operating frequency for each QS
O
> in the band column. ONLY LOGS WITH EXACT WRITTEN FREQUENCIES WILL BE
> ELIGIBLE FOR THE PLAQUES."
>
>
>
> This means that they don't welcome us who don't use CAT for logging (at
> least for the 2nd radio). Actually this rule says unofficially: you are
not
> allowed to win without the logging exact frequencies (I wonder if  0.1kHz
is
> enough)
>
>
>
> Well, fortunately it is summertime and drinking beer outside is much
better
> option than operating EUHFC 2004 :)
>
>
>
> Another change in the rules is that operating time is now till 2359 UTC
> instead of 2200.
>
>
>
> 73, Timo OH1NOA
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest