[CQ-Contest] 160M in CW WPX

Dave VO1AU at rac.ca
Mon May 24 15:15:29 EDT 2004


I recall one clever fellow remarking "if you're on 160m in the WPX contest,
you're losing."  It's missionary work, but good luck to you if you do it.

73,

Dave
VO1AU at rac.ca


----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete Smith" <n4zr at contesting.com>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:56 AM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] 160M in CW WPX


> It's been a few years since I last did the CW WPX, and I didn't have a
160M
> antenna then.  The question, basically, is whether it's worth spending
time
> on 160 and, if so, what sort of schedule people tend to observe?  Do you
go
> from 40 or 80 to 160 during the night at intervals, or???
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> The World HF Contest Station Database
> was updated on April 26, 2004
> 2706 contest stations at
> www.pvrc.org/WCSD/WCSDsearch.htm
>
>
>



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list