[CQ-Contest] 160M in CW WPX

[jukka.klemola at nokia.com]

In Europe there are a couple of multis available exclusively
on Top Band, no offers anywhere else.

I guess same applies everywhere.

All will benefit of a couple of Top Band QSOs.

Spending many hours there is of course unnecessary.

One hour total should do.


73,
Jukka

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of ext Dave
> Sent: 24 May, 2004 22:15
> To: Cq-Contest at Contesting.Com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 160M in CW WPX
> 
> 
> I recall one clever fellow remarking "if you're on 160m in 
> the WPX contest,
> you're losing."  It's missionary work, but good luck to you 
> if you do it.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Dave
> VO1AU at rac.ca
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pete Smith" <n4zr at contesting.com>
> To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:56 AM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] 160M in CW WPX
> 
> 
> > It's been a few years since I last did the CW WPX, and I 
> didn't have a
> 160M
> > antenna then.  The question, basically, is whether it's 
> worth spending
> time
> > on 160 and, if so, what sort of schedule people tend to 
> observe?  Do you
> go
> > from 40 or 80 to 160 during the night at intervals, or???
> >
> > 73, Pete N4ZR
> > The World HF Contest Station Database
> > was updated on April 26, 2004
> > 2706 contest stations at
> > www.pvrc.org/WCSD/WCSDsearch.htm
> >
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>