[CQ-Contest] cqww dxcluster use

[John WA2GO]

I have no idea what we are getting at here, but statistically speaking, if 
you graph the (z+c)/q value and draw a best fit curve, the only ones that 
are noteworthy are #2 & #7 which are slightly above the curve and #9 which 
is slightly below it. But this is a very small sample size, and the stations 
are all over the globe, and may have different preferences as to how much 
time they spend running vs. searching, so I would hesitate to draw any 
conclusions at all.  Looking at the same graph for, say the top 25 scores on 
each continent would be a much more statistically meaningful exercise.

WA2GO


>From: Bill Tippett <btippett at alum.mit.edu>
>To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww dxcluster use
>Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 09:37:45 -0500
>
>SM2EKM wrote:
> >This list is interesting. Anyone got any reactions
>to it?
>
>         Add a column which shows total multipliers (Z+C)
>divided by total QSO's and see if anything looks odd.
>Same issue I had a few years ago...which CQ addressed
>in their SSB results story in Aug 2001.
>
>                                         73,  Bill
>
>Non-USA SOAB HP
>A61AJ(S53R)       7304   175   624    48 16,234,881
>OE4A(OE1EMS)      5206   169   644    45  9,749,496
>FS/AH8DX          5544   134   484    46  8,433,228
>VO1AU             4491   125   510    42  7,599,045
>VO1MP             4058   118   471    34  6,619,771
>M6T(G4PIQ)        4505   148   498 42.75  6,576,926
>LY4A(LY2FY)       4021   167   646    44  6,359,286
>DJ5MW             3911   145   560    46  5,737,290
>V55V(ZS6MG)       3467   140   396    36  5,449,512
>RZ9OZO(RZ9UA)     2842   146   526  41,5  5,024,544
>
>
>1
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest