[CQ-Contest] Packet statistics

[kd4d at comcast.net]

Hi Mauri:

I think we'll just have to agree to disagree.  :-)  However, M/M
is a much different animal than single op and I do believe that 
packet helps us at W3LPL for instance. 

I do NOT condone cheating by monitoring packet clusters and
claiming unassisted...I just don't believe very many of the top 
unassisted operators are doing it.

73,

Mark, KD4D


> On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:15:05 +0000, kd4d at comcast.net <kd4d at comcast.net> wrote:

> 
> It has been verified in a MM or MS that packet finally hepls a lot if
> properly used, although skills and stations always make the
> difference.
> The rulement of better skills and stations plays its role, but in a plain field.
> At present, a plain field is not enforced at all, beeing only left at
> individual will.
>  
> > I do not believe that most of the high-scoring single operators
> > are cheating by using packet and claiming unassisted.  I
> > certainly don't believe it is true of the ones I know personally.
> 
> I stay on my own, and as i do, a lot of people do believe the
> opposite. Something should be done, but know that anyway I have the
> greatest respect for those who really play unassisted, even if they
> don't win.
> 
> 73,
> Mauri  I4JMY
>  
> > 73,
> > 
> > Mark, KD4D
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > I've the perception that excluding newbies, casuals and purists at
> > > first point, the rest of people when watching at results believes that
> > > higher unassisted scores are consequence to the second way of
> > > operating.
> > >
> > >
> > > 73,
> > > Mauri I4JMY