[CQ-Contest] Contests without no-packet operation

[Keith Kerr]

Well said. I could not agree more.
Keith GM4YXI (GM7V)
Small towers, SO2R (but inept), packetless shack


>
>Comparing packet to big beams and towers is nonsense.  The bottom line  is
>there is only one person operating and finding stations at my big towered
>station......me.  In packet assisted, it is a multi-op no matter how 
>you  slice it.
>  I heard the same baloney about two radio  operation......still only one op,
>regardless of the number of radios.
>
>I have no problems with other stations using packet, as long as they admit
>using it when scores are submitted.  If it increases their 
>enjoyment,  great.
>It's a shame though, that we have to change the rules by making  everyone in
>the packet class, because some dirtbags cheat.
>
>Bill K4XS........big towers, SO2R and packetless  contesting
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


------------
Dr Keith M Kerr,
Consultant and Clinical Senior Lecturer,
Department of Pathology,
Aberdeen University Medical School
and Aberdeen Royal Infirmary,
Foresterhill,
Aberdeen,
Scotland, UK,
AB25  2ZD
Tel 01224 552414   Fax  01224 663002
k.kerr at abdn.ac.uk