[CQ-Contest] Packet statistics

[Yuri VE3DZ]

So the best way would be one single-op category (like it used to be many
years before) without power separation + allowing cluster use for all
categories (no self-spotting allowed).
Also one category for Multi-Ops.
This would also eliminate huge "QRP" and low power signals (and records) and
some other "technical issues".

73  Yuri  VE3DZ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Maurizio Panicara" <i4jmy.mauri at gmail.com>
To: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a at bit.si>
Cc: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 4:22 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet statistics


> > I am afraid that the same kind of "smart" thinking applies on excesive
> > power!
>
> Power is another issue and deserves another thread.
> Technically, any ERP can be obtained with almost any input power
> level, and no one can verify remotely, the only plain field occurs in
> WRTC.
> Packet problem instead, assisted/unassisted, can be easily overcomed
> updating to actual days and merging the categories in a single one.
> Sometimes, hypocrisy is enforced or engaged by stupid rules.
>
> 73,
> Mauri I4JMY