[CQ-Contest] Here we go again

[Richard Zalewski]

How did we get sidetracked?  I suggested a general overhaul of classes for
contests including looking at packet and we are now beating up on
sweepstakes.

Dick W7ZR

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb at earthlink.net>
To: "Pete Smith" <n4zr at contesting.com>; "Richard Zalewski"
<w7zr at citlink.net>; "CQ-Contest" <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again


>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Pete Smith <n4zr at contesting.com>
> > To: Richard Zalewski <w7zr at citlink.net>; Cq-Contest
> <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> > Date: 11/23/2004 12:35:21 PM
> > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again
> >
> > While we're at it, let's get serious about revising this contest to
> > stimulate more activity.  Make mults one per band rather than
> > overall.
>
> This is an idea which should not be tossed aside lightly.
>
> It should be HURLED ASIDE WITH GREAT FORCE since it would effectively
> eliminate the northern tier states (especially the upper midwest) from the
> competition.
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>