[CQ-Contest] Here we go again

[N7MAL]

Here's a first, mark this day on your calendars. I 100% agree with K0HB. I would also like to add making a change for the sake of making a change is, has been, and will always be a bad idea. Considering the longevity of this contest,it's been around longer than most people on this list have been alive, a simple saying from a wise man applies: "IF IT AIN'T BROKE DON'T FIX IT"
73

MAL               N7MAL
BULLHEAD CITY, AZ
http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: K0HB 
  To: Pete Smith ; Richard Zalewski ; CQ-Contest 
  Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 4:32 PM
  Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again



  > [Original Message]
  > From: Pete Smith <n4zr at contesting.com>
  > To: Richard Zalewski <w7zr at citlink.net>; Cq-Contest
  <cq-contest at contesting.com>
  > Date: 11/23/2004 12:35:21 PM
  > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again
  >
  > While we're at it, let's get serious about revising this contest to 
  > stimulate more activity.  Make mults one per band rather than 
  > overall.  

  This is an idea which should not be tossed aside lightly.  

  It should be HURLED ASIDE WITH GREAT FORCE since it would effectively
  eliminate the northern tier states (especially the upper midwest) from the
  competition.

  73, de Hans, K0HB







  _______________________________________________
  CQ-Contest mailing list
  CQ-Contest at contesting.com
  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest