[CQ-Contest] Here we go again
Bill Coleman
aa4lr at arrl.net
Fri Nov 26 11:40:10 EST 2004
On Nov 23, 2004, at 7:19 AM, Pete Smith wrote:
> While we're at it, let's get serious about revising this contest to
> stimulate more activity. Make mults one per band rather than overall.
> Wouldn't the first 5-band or 6-band sweep be something? Allow one
> QSO per station per band, and eliminate the Sunday doldrums.
Every year this is suggested, and every year it is a bad idea.
We already have a contest that allows one QSO per station per band,
along with mults per band. It is called the North American QSO Party.
SS does not need to be a longer NAQP.
SS is challenging the way it is. There's no need to "fix" it, since it
isn't broken.
> In the past, suggestions of this sort were met with the complaint,
> "That'd be just another NAQP."
Yes, because it would be.
> My response is "What's wrong with that," particularly if it attracts
> SS-plus levels of participation instead of the few hundred regulars
> who get involved in NAQPs.
I love the NAQPs! But I also like SS the way it is. Viva la difference!
Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
-- Wilbur Wright, 1901
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list