[CQ-Contest] Here we go again

ak0a ak0a at kc.rr.com
Mon Nov 29 10:28:20 EST 2004


I agree with you Bill. the only people who are against this are the SO2R 
ops. Why? I cant figure out. What are they scared of?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242 at ispwest.com>
To: "i4jmy" <i4jmy.mauri at gmail.com>
Cc: "KL7RA" <kl7ra at ptialaska.net>; <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again


> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:25:09 +0100, i4jmy wrote:
>
>>This concept is wise and should have been adopted, but such an idea
>>implies mind flexibility and will to learn, as well as the real
>>understanding of the word "competition".
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
> I am glad to see the SO2R folks have "mind flexibility" and understand
> the word "competition".  Flexing their minds, they will now understand
> why having the ability to listen while transmitting makes the
> competition "unfair" and why an SO1R category helps make it more fair.
>
> Likewise, they understand the competition is most fair and most
> exciting when the playing field is as level as possible, and will work
> to make it so.
>
> They will now understand why Indy cars do not race against stock cars,
> why heavyweights do not box middleweights and why 40-foot sailboats do
> not race against 20-footers.  The Indy car guys do not point to the
> stock car guys and say "life is not fair, get used to it".
>
> If their minds really are flexible, they will understand that all
> sports, other than amateur radio, make a serious attempt to level the
> playing field as much as possible.
>
> And for what seems like the zillionth time, NOBODY WANTS TO BAN SO2R.
> They just want SO1R in its own category.  There is at least one
> contest which already does this: The Mexican RTTY contest, held the
> second weekend of February.  Perhaps other contest sponsors will take
> note?
>
> --
> Bill W6WRT
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.2 - Release Date: 11/24/2004
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list