[CQ-Contest] Typing practice
don.field at gmail.com
Thu Aug 4 13:39:15 EDT 2005
Not all contest adjudicators rely 100% on automation. For CQWW it is
understandable that they have gone this way, because the task is huge. With
the IOTA contest, which I manage, we use automated checking to highlight
potential busted QSOs, but no QSO is actually busted by a machine - the
final decision is made by a human being - some sort of ancient chemical
processor, rapidly being rendered obsolete. And the task is a big one - we
have typically 250k QSOs in the database (with CQWW I would guess it's over
a million). If 3% of QSOs are broken, that's about 8,000 QSOs that have to
be eyeballed, a pretty big task. But obviously more and more can be done by
software each year - for example, the code to check whether a busted "O"
might actually have been a legitimate "zero" can't be more than a few
IOTA Contest Manager
On 8/3/05, David Robbins K1TTT <k1ttt at arrl.net> wrote:
> > Someone could write a little program to scrub a Cabrillo log for errors
> > like this before submission. i.e., "P Four OH is not a valid prefix."
> > logging programs, in fact, every program, should put a slash through
> > zeroes.
> Excellent idea... I will add that to the busted callsign rules that are in
> the n1mm logger. There must be some others like that also that I will add
> to the rules.
> David Robbins K1TTT
> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt at arrl.net
> web: http://www.k1ttt.net
> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest