[CQ-Contest] Tossing meaningless categories [was: Log checking questions]
K3BU@aol.com
K3BU at aol.com
Fri Dec 16 16:59:55 EST 2005
In a message dated 12/16/2005 2:55:43 PM Eastern Standard Time,
dezrat1242 at ispwest.com writes:
>>1. A strictly limited hardware setup, much like the WRTC contest for
those who prefer to focus on the traditional style of contesting. One
radio, no packet or telnet, one antenna per band, etc.<<
Well, you have WRTC for that.
Ham radio contesting is technical sport. It is your station (technology), you
the operator (skill, knowledge). We have limit on hardware in the power limit
and categories. The rest is use your brains and skills and knowledge to build
better station than competition. Otherwise where do we stop? Spark, hand key,
dipole, bla, bla (insert your personal category)? Where is the line for
"traditional contesting"?
So enough already! There is internet "contesting" with superequal "equipment"
if you want it, make the rules and see the hordes comes. Have a contest there
with real time score reporting. No need for no stinkin equipment and "rich"
guys dominating it.
You have the "wheelchair" categories in other contests like WPX
(tribander/wires).
CQ WW has matured to world premier contest, lets make it better and more
equal (and sane) with 1 point for domestic, two for own continent and three points
for outside of continent QSO. Record integrity will be maintained, incentive
to operate increased for most populous countries and less bias in scoring.
73 Yuri, K3BU
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list