[CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS?
Nat Heatwole
nat at ajheatwole.com
Mon Dec 19 20:45:48 EST 2005
It was a very different story for SS SSB this year. Look at all of those
QSOs on 160m:
http://lists.contesting.com/archives/html/3830/2005-11/msg01389.html
Although I've never seen a 3830 score report that had QSOs on 160m prior to
this year's SS contests.
73!
Nat WZ3AR
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Dale Martin
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 7:48 PM
To: CQ-Contest at contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS?
Why is there a 160m band category (?) in SS CW/SSB?
In looking over the 3830 band summary for 2005 SS CW, out of 423 submitted
reports, there's only one station reporting making as many as 1 QSO on 160.
Why even bother to carry this band as a usable band in SS?
Say..um.ummmm..that opened wine bottle from the back of the bottom tray of
the refrigerator wasn't all that bad.
73,
Dale, kg5u
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list