[CQ-Contest] Time for a fix
Richard DiDonna NN3W
NN3W at prodigy.net
Mon Jan 31 21:12:28 EST 2005
Some would make the same argument for CQWW when the
east coasters get chip-shots at EU while the Left
coast gets to listen in.
You also have to remember that this is not a US-only
contest. There needs to be some incentive for home
country stations to treat the contest as something
more than a single band Sweepstakes.
Rich NN3W
--- Original Message ---
From: "Barkey, Patrick M." <pbarkey at bsu.edu>
To: <CQ-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Time for a fix
>Does anyone else have a problem with this:
>=20
>Single op:
>=20
>NN1N 955 59 52 10 440,892
YCCC
>=20
>Multi op:
>=20
>K9NR(@WB9Z) 1329 59 42 30 350,470
SMC
>=20
>=20
>All these guys are my friends, and I'm not picking on
anyone
>individually.
>But when a New England station that operates 10 hours
beats a full-blown
>W9 multi-op by 25% there is something wrong with the
contest rules.
>=20
>I think the CQ 160 guys need to throttle-back on the
10-point rule for
>inter-
>continental QSO's. Its kinda hard to get psyched up
back here for this
>kind of beating otherwise.
>=20
> - Pat
> N9RV
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-
contest
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list