[CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion?

[Kelly Taylor]

The point lost due to my desire to be brief was this: we will never know how
many of those 95 Qs they would have worked anyway. If they would have worked
all 95 regardless, net gain is zero.

So even 95 is a misleading statement about advantage.

73, kelly
ve4xt
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W at prodigy.net>
To: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt at mts.net>; <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>; "Bill
Turner" <dezrat1242 at ispwest.com>
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion?


> >Bill, we've disagreed on this before, but if the best
> operators say the
> >advantage is maybe 95 QSOs out of 1200, is it that
> huge?
> >
> >73, kelly
> >ve4xt
>
> In Sweepstakes, absolutely.  Especially when everybody
> has 80 mults.
>
> Not that I disagree with SO2R, but I do disagree with
> your point.
>
> 73 Rich NN3W
>
>