[CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion?
ve4xt at mts.net
Fri Nov 11 17:41:32 EST 2005
The point lost due to my desire to be brief was this: we will never know how
many of those 95 Qs they would have worked anyway. If they would have worked
all 95 regardless, net gain is zero.
So even 95 is a misleading statement about advantage.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W at prodigy.net>
To: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt at mts.net>; <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>; "Bill
Turner" <dezrat1242 at ispwest.com>
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion?
> >Bill, we've disagreed on this before, but if the best
> operators say the
> >advantage is maybe 95 QSOs out of 1200, is it that
> >73, kelly
> In Sweepstakes, absolutely. Especially when everybody
> has 80 mults.
> Not that I disagree with SO2R, but I do disagree with
> your point.
> 73 Rich NN3W
More information about the CQ-Contest